[dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax?

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 10:22:25 UTC

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Why not just assign whole element sets to a namespace, in the external DSDL framework,
> and leave the syntax of DTDs exactly as it is?

I don't understand this. How do you specify that the content model
of a foo:one element is a foo:two element followed by an html:p element?

> But this is discussing techniques before requirements.

A habit of mine, I fear.

> What are the requirements for DTDs in DSDL?

The title of Part 9 is all we have to go on, and it talks about
namespace-aware and datatype-aware DTDs.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Fri Jun 14 06:23:01 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:26 UTC