Ronald Bourret wrote:
>
> james anderson wrote:
>
...
> > How is one to use a declaration with indefinite scope to emulate the
> > lexical scope of attribute-based declarations within the
> > document entity?
>
> One doesn't. Why is this a requirement? (Note that the proposed
> validation DTD is no different from other schema languages in this
> respect. Neither is intended to perform lexical validation of QNames.)
>
If this is true, then one eliminates those document forms which exhibit synonomy and/or homography from the set of conforming
documents. Which exclused exactly those documents for which one really needs the machinery entailed by namespaces.
...
-- DSDL comments To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Fri Jun 14 07:09:24 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:26 UTC