[dsdl-comment] Re: attachPlaceholder and subsequent attach actions (NVDL)

Murata-san

Re: If it is bad, should we try to publish an amendment or technical
corrigendum?

Technical corrigendum - it is not a simple editorial change

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "MURATA Makoto" <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
To: <dsdl-comment@dsdl.org>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:12 PM
Subject: [dsdl-comment] attachPlaceholder and subsequent attach actions
(NVDL)

> All,
>
> attach actions can be cascaded. For example, consider element sections
> es1, es2, and es3, where es1 and es2 are parent sections of es2 and es3,
> respectively. If a <validate> action is applied to es1 and <attach>
> actions are applied to both es2 and es3, then es3 is embedded within es2,
> which in turn is embedded within es1.
>
> However, attachPlaceHolder does not allow cascading. Suppose that, in
> the above example, <attachPlaceholder> is applied to es2. Then, es3
> is NOT embedded within the placeholder element created by the
> attachPlaceholder
> action. The same thing applies to attribute sections.
>
> Is this a good thing or bad thing? If it is bad, should we
> try to publish an amendment or technical corrigendum?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL comments
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)