[dsdl-comment] Re: attachPlaceholder and subsequent attach actions (NVDL)

Murata san,

I don't see why it may be a bad thing :
AttachPlaceHolder generate an *empty* element, so I don't see why
suddently it should have children.

I may probably be useful, but I don't see a use case for it

Regards,

Mohamed

On 9/10/07, MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> wrote:
> All,
>
> attach actions can be cascaded. For example, consider element sections
> es1, es2, and es3, where es1 and es2 are parent sections of es2 and es3,
> respectively. If a <validate> action is applied to es1 and <attach>
> actions are applied to both es2 and es3, then es3 is embedded within es2,
> which in turn is embedded within es1.
>
> However, attachPlaceHolder does not allow cascading. Suppose that, in
> the above example, <attachPlaceholder> is applied to es2. Then, es3
> is NOT embedded within the placeholder element created by the attachPlaceholder
> action. The same thing applies to attribute sections.
>
> Is this a good thing or bad thing? If it is bad, should we
> try to publish an amendment or technical corrigendum?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL comments
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)