Can you quote the part you thing is leading to trouble ?
On 9/11/07, MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> wrote:
> > I think all implementation SHOULD validate it twice, unless they have
> > very good reason to do so.
>
> I agree. (I would even say "SHALL".) But one could argue that the
> current text means validation once. Should we try to make the text
> clearer?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL comments
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>
-- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 € -- DSDL comments To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Tue Sep 11 16:12:31 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 12 2007 - 03:13:02 UTC