[dsdl-comment] Re: Once or twice? (NVDL)

Please try to clarify the text if at all possible

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "MURATA Makoto" <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
To: <dsdl-comment@dsdl.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:06 PM
Subject: [dsdl-comment] Re: Once or twice? (NVDL)

>> I think all implementation SHOULD validate it twice, unless they have
>> very good reason to do so.
>
> I agree. (I would even say "SHALL".) But one could argue that the
> current text means validation once. Should we try to make the text
> clearer?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL comments
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)