[dsdl-comment] Re: Once or twice? (NVDL)

On 12/09/2007, MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> wrote:
> Sure.
>
> The first and second bullets in the itemized list in Clause 8.6 are
> slightly defective. In this mail, I only consider the first bullet.

> Since this definition is set-theroretic,
<snip/>

> But I am not sure if the definition of equality of v1 and v2 is clear.
> One could argue that v1 = v2 exactly when v1 and v2 are represtend by
> the same element (after simplification of NVDL scripts). One could
> also argue that v1 = v2 when they specify the same schema and specify
> the same options. The former interpretation leads to validation twice
> while the second leads to validation once. Is this a fanatical concern?

Fanatical? No.
Deeply math based? Yes.
Widely understood? I'd say no :-)

I'd prefer plain English to the set theoretic?

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)