[dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode)

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon May 12 2008 - 14:28:53 UTC

2008/5/12 Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>:
> Dave Pawson wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> > I was thinking procedurally, that the mode indicated from the
> > startMode *must* come first for validity.
>
> > I find my reasoning here 'intuitively' right (even if wrong!!!)
>
> Not if you think declaratively or if you think 'rules' ;-)

Yet Georges 'nested' example provides the 'procedural' (ordering) aspect.
I like the "Rules == declarations of despatch" idea.

Thanks Florent.

Another one (seperate email :-)

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Mon May 12 16:28:57 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 12 2008 - 14:38:02 UTC