[dsdl-comment] Re: (re)define element in another namespace (was: nvdl context element usage)

Dave Pawson wrote:

> 2008/5/14 Florent Georges <lists@fgeorges.org>:

> > If I understand you correctly, the Atom schema depends on the
> > XHTML schema (by importing it).

> No, it has div (in the xhtml namespace)
> then an 'any content' schema within that?
> I.e. it was developed without thinking of NVDL :-)
> and it was left 'open' for anything

> <define name="xhtmlDiv">
> <element name="xhtml:div">
> <!--
> <zeroOrMore>
> <choice>
> <attribute>
> <anyName/>
> </attribute>
> <text/>
> <ref name="anyXHTML"/>
> </choice>
> </zeroOrMore>
> -->
> <empty/>
> </element>
> </define>

  Ok. For me, that looks like they are looking for trouble... It
seems weird to define an element in another namespace, while this
element is already defined in another spec, and define it differently.

  What people here think about that?

  Regards,

--drkm

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail

--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)