[dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL

Hi Roger,

Le jeudi 29 mai 2008 à 14:49 -0400, Costello, Roger L. a écrit :
> Hi Folks,
>
> 1. I just saw this on a web site:
>
> "I'm personally against NVDL, I think I would rather have XProc used
> to deliver multiple schema languages because then I also have all the
> benefits of XProc in my architecture."
>
> I don't know enough about XProc to respond. Can someone who is
> familiar with XProc respond to this?

The big downside I see in using XProc to run XSLT transformations that
split a document before validation is that it becomes very difficult to
report where errors belong in the original document. And, of course,
having a meaningful error reporting is very important when you validate
a document.

Eric

-- 
GPG-PGP: 2A528005
Curious about Relax NG? Read my book online.
                                   http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)