dsdl-comment.2008-05 By messages with attachments

98 messages: Starting Tue May 06 2008 - 15:07:47 UTC, Ending Fri May 30 2008 - 04:38:32 UTC
This period: Most recent messages
sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]

[dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Jirka Kosek (Sun May 11 2008 - 18:33:19 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: Monolithic schemas are bad, right? Jirka Kosek (Sat May 17 2008 - 20:41:50 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Jirka Kosek (Mon May 26 2008 - 12:33:54 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial Jirka Kosek (Mon May 26 2008 - 13:11:40 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Jirka Kosek (Wed May 28 2008 - 07:13:12 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Jirka Kosek (Wed May 28 2008 - 08:05:00 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL Eric van der Vlist (Thu May 29 2008 - 19:49:14 UTC)
1. signature.asc (190 bytes)
[dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL Jirka Kosek (Thu May 29 2008 - 20:07:49 UTC)
1. signature.asc (251 bytes)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 30 2008 - 02:43:04 UTC