dsdl-comment.2008-05 By Author
- Costello, Roger L.
- [dsdl-comment] FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL (Thu May 29 2008 - 18:49:21 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Need help understanding triggers (Wed May 28 2008 - 13:30:06 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Need help understanding triggers (Wed May 28 2008 - 00:26:22 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial (Mon May 26 2008 - 15:29:27 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial (Mon May 26 2008 - 13:17:23 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial (Mon May 26 2008 - 13:05:52 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] ANN: NVDL Tutorial (Sun May 25 2008 - 23:01:06 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) (Fri May 23 2008 - 11:51:15 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Thu May 22 2008 - 13:46:08 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnot attached to its parent) (Wed May 21 2008 - 20:32:01 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) (Wed May 21 2008 - 19:53:18 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Problem with specifying the <Book> section occur only within the <soap:Body> element (Tue May 20 2008 - 15:33:58 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Problem with specifying the <Book> section occur only within the <soap:Body> element (Mon May 19 2008 - 22:49:56 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Monolithic schemas are bad, right? (Sat May 17 2008 - 14:01:07 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (nested mode versus independent modes) (Tue May 13 2008 - 16:54:02 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (oneusesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 22:31:15 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Sun May 11 2008 - 17:10:00 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Terminology Question: An NVDL document is a "script"? (Sun May 11 2008 - 13:04:12 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Sun May 11 2008 - 13:00:25 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Two NVDL Questions: (1) schemaType = Best Practice? (2) MIME type of RNG, XSD, SCH, DTD schemas? (Tue May 06 2008 - 11:25:59 UTC)
- Dave Pawson
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL (Wed May 28 2008 - 09:56:14 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL (Wed May 28 2008 - 07:54:26 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] validate options in NVRL (Tue May 27 2008 - 08:01:30 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Mon May 26 2008 - 09:48:06 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial (Mon May 26 2008 - 08:28:11 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] rnc schema issue (Mon May 26 2008 - 08:01:43 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Sat May 24 2008 - 15:29:22 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: NVDL para 6.4.1 (Fri May 23 2008 - 15:25:19 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Fri May 23 2008 - 08:04:45 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Fri May 23 2008 - 07:39:33 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] NVDL para 6.4.1 (Thu May 22 2008 - 17:28:10 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Base URI in NVDL, from Relax NG spec (Thu May 22 2008 - 16:28:43 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Thu May 22 2008 - 16:08:34 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Monolithic schemas are bad, right? (Sat May 17 2008 - 14:07:32 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: (re)define element in another namespace (was: nvdl context element usage) (Wed May 14 2008 - 12:00:14 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 11:02:36 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 10:34:27 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 10:09:32 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 08:48:18 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 08:08:21 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 07:34:03 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 14:39:57 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Atom - despatch to xhtml schema (Mon May 12 2008 - 14:35:46 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 14:28:53 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 14:06:14 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 12:30:31 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 06:40:06 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Terminology Question: An NVDL document is a "script"? (Sun May 11 2008 - 14:11:52 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Sun May 11 2008 - 14:07:50 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] nvdl schema (Wed May 07 2008 - 08:48:16 UTC)
- Eric van der Vlist
- Florent Georges
- George Cristian Bina
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL (Thu May 29 2008 - 19:54:27 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Mon May 26 2008 - 09:17:00 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial (Mon May 26 2008 - 09:00:30 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) (Fri May 23 2008 - 12:41:12 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Fri May 23 2008 - 07:58:52 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Fri May 23 2008 - 06:08:31 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) (Thu May 22 2008 - 15:04:18 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnot attached to its parent) (Wed May 21 2008 - 23:26:00 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) (Wed May 21 2008 - 20:18:21 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Problem with specifying the <Book> section occur only within the <soap:Body> element (Tue May 20 2008 - 08:15:07 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: (re)define element in another namespace (Wed May 14 2008 - 12:41:50 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 11:49:05 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 10:14:41 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 08:32:31 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage (Wed May 14 2008 - 08:00:06 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (nested mode versus independent modes) (Tue May 13 2008 - 18:20:14 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 21:51:06 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 14:34:44 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 13:44:45 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Mon May 12 2008 - 06:51:11 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Terminology Question: An NVDL document is a "script"? (Sun May 11 2008 - 18:18:04 UTC)
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) (Sun May 11 2008 - 18:14:37 UTC)
- Jirka Kosek
- John Cowan
- MURATA Makoto
- Rick Jelliffe
- rjelliffe@allette.com.au
- Last message date: Fri May 30 2008 - 04:38:32 UTC
- Archived on: Fri May 30 2008 - 02:43:04 UTC