dsdl-comment.2008-05: By Date

Tue May 06 2008 - 11:25:59 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Two NVDL Questions: (1) schemaType = Best Practice? (2) MIME type of RNG, XSD, SCH, DTD schemas? Costello, Roger L.
Tue May 06 2008 - 15:16:26 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Two NVDL Questions: (1) schemaType = Best Practice? (2) MIME type of RNG, XSD, SCH, DTD schemas? MURATA Makoto
Wed May 07 2008 - 08:48:16 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] nvdl schema Dave Pawson
Wed May 07 2008 - 11:37:19 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl schema MURATA Makoto
Sun May 11 2008 - 13:00:25 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Costello, Roger L.
Sun May 11 2008 - 13:04:12 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Terminology Question: An NVDL document is a "script"? Costello, Roger L.
Sun May 11 2008 - 14:07:50 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Dave Pawson
Sun May 11 2008 - 14:11:52 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Terminology Question: An NVDL document is a "script"? Dave Pawson
Sun May 11 2008 - 17:10:00 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Costello, Roger L.
Sun May 11 2008 - 18:14:37 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) George Cristian Bina
Sun May 11 2008 - 18:18:04 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Terminology Question: An NVDL document is a "script"? George Cristian Bina
Sun May 11 2008 - 18:33:19 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one uses a mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Jirka Kosek
Mon May 12 2008 - 06:40:06 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Dave Pawson
Mon May 12 2008 - 06:51:11 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) George Cristian Bina
Mon May 12 2008 - 12:30:31 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Dave Pawson
Mon May 12 2008 - 13:44:45 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) George Cristian Bina
Mon May 12 2008 - 14:06:14 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Dave Pawson
Mon May 12 2008 - 14:07:54 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Florent Georges
Mon May 12 2008 - 14:28:53 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Dave Pawson
Mon May 12 2008 - 14:34:44 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) George Cristian Bina
Mon May 12 2008 - 14:35:46 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Atom - despatch to xhtml schema Dave Pawson
Mon May 12 2008 - 14:39:57 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Dave Pawson
Mon May 12 2008 - 17:24:48 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Florent Georges
Mon May 12 2008 - 21:51:06 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (one usesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) George Cristian Bina
Mon May 12 2008 - 22:31:15 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (oneusesa mode, the other doesn't use a mode) Costello, Roger L.
Tue May 13 2008 - 16:54:02 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (nested mode versus independent modes) Costello, Roger L.
Tue May 13 2008 - 18:20:14 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (nested mode versus independent modes) George Cristian Bina
Tue May 13 2008 - 22:41:54 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Are these two NVDL documents equivalent? (nested mode versus independent modes) MURATA Makoto
Wed May 14 2008 - 07:34:03 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] nvdl context element usage Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 08:00:06 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage George Cristian Bina
Wed May 14 2008 - 08:08:21 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 08:32:31 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage George Cristian Bina
Wed May 14 2008 - 08:48:18 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 09:00:05 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage Florent Georges
Wed May 14 2008 - 10:09:32 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 10:14:41 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage George Cristian Bina
Wed May 14 2008 - 10:34:27 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 11:02:36 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 11:49:05 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: nvdl context element usage George Cristian Bina
Wed May 14 2008 - 11:40:50 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: (re)define element in another namespace (was: nvdl context element usage) Florent Georges
Wed May 14 2008 - 12:00:14 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: (re)define element in another namespace (was: nvdl context element usage) Dave Pawson
Wed May 14 2008 - 12:41:50 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: (re)define element in another namespace George Cristian Bina
Sat May 17 2008 - 14:01:07 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Monolithic schemas are bad, right? Costello, Roger L.
Sat May 17 2008 - 14:07:32 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Monolithic schemas are bad, right? Dave Pawson
Sat May 17 2008 - 20:41:50 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Monolithic schemas are bad, right? Jirka Kosek
Sun May 18 2008 - 09:18:50 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Monolithic schemas are bad, right? rjelliffe@allette.com.au
Mon May 19 2008 - 22:49:56 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Problem with specifying the <Book> section occur only within the <soap:Body> element Costello, Roger L.
Tue May 20 2008 - 08:15:07 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Problem with specifying the <Book> section occur only within the <soap:Body> element George Cristian Bina
Tue May 20 2008 - 15:33:58 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Problem with specifying the <Book> section occur only within the <soap:Body> element Costello, Roger L.
Wed May 21 2008 - 19:53:18 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) Costello, Roger L.
Wed May 21 2008 - 20:18:21 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Wed May 21 2008 - 20:32:01 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnot attached to its parent) Costello, Roger L.
Wed May 21 2008 - 23:26:00 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnot attached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Thu May 22 2008 - 13:46:08 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Costello, Roger L.
Thu May 22 2008 - 15:04:18 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Thu May 22 2008 - 16:08:34 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Dave Pawson
Thu May 22 2008 - 16:28:43 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Base URI in NVDL, from Relax NG spec Dave Pawson
Thu May 22 2008 - 17:28:10 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] NVDL para 6.4.1 Dave Pawson
Fri May 23 2008 - 06:08:31 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Fri May 23 2008 - 07:39:33 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Dave Pawson
Fri May 23 2008 - 07:58:52 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Fri May 23 2008 - 08:04:45 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Dave Pawson
Fri May 23 2008 - 11:51:15 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) Costello, Roger L.
Fri May 23 2008 - 12:41:12 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (which is attached to its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which is not attached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Fri May 23 2008 - 15:17:19 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Base URI in NVDL, from Relax NG spec MURATA Makoto
Fri May 23 2008 - 15:20:49 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: NVDL para 6.4.1 MURATA Makoto
Fri May 23 2008 - 15:25:19 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: NVDL para 6.4.1 Dave Pawson
Sat May 24 2008 - 15:29:22 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Dave Pawson
Sun May 25 2008 - 23:01:06 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] ANN: NVDL Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
Mon May 26 2008 - 08:01:43 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] rnc schema issue Dave Pawson
Mon May 26 2008 - 08:28:11 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial Dave Pawson
Mon May 26 2008 - 09:00:30 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial George Cristian Bina
Mon May 26 2008 - 09:17:00 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) George Cristian Bina
Mon May 26 2008 - 09:48:06 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Dave Pawson
Mon May 26 2008 - 12:33:54 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Section with a child section (whichis attachedto its parent), and the child section itself has a child section (which isnotattached to its parent) Jirka Kosek
Mon May 26 2008 - 13:05:52 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
Mon May 26 2008 - 13:11:40 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial Jirka Kosek
Mon May 26 2008 - 13:17:23 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
Mon May 26 2008 - 14:36:46 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial MURATA Makoto
Mon May 26 2008 - 15:29:27 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: ANN: NVDL Tutorial Costello, Roger L.
Tue May 27 2008 - 08:01:30 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] validate options in NVRL Dave Pawson
Tue May 27 2008 - 09:55:22 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Rick Jelliffe
Wed May 28 2008 - 00:26:22 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Need help understanding triggers Costello, Roger L.
Wed May 28 2008 - 01:37:36 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Need help understanding triggers MURATA Makoto
Wed May 28 2008 - 04:35:26 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL MURATA Makoto
Wed May 28 2008 - 07:13:12 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Jirka Kosek
Wed May 28 2008 - 07:54:26 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Dave Pawson
Wed May 28 2008 - 08:05:00 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Jirka Kosek
Wed May 28 2008 - 08:16:56 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Rick Jelliffe
Wed May 28 2008 - 09:56:14 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: validate options in NVRL Dave Pawson
Wed May 28 2008 - 13:30:06 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: Need help understanding triggers Costello, Roger L.
Thu May 29 2008 - 18:49:21 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL Costello, Roger L.
Thu May 29 2008 - 19:08:22 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL John Cowan
Thu May 29 2008 - 19:49:14 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL Eric van der Vlist
Thu May 29 2008 - 20:07:49 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL Jirka Kosek
Thu May 29 2008 - 19:54:27 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL George Cristian Bina
Thu May 29 2008 - 23:05:41 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL MURATA Makoto
Fri May 30 2008 - 02:39:39 UTC
- [dsdl-comment] Re: FAQ: (1) NVDL versus XProc, (2) Performance of NVDL Rick Jelliffe

Last message date: Fri May 30 2008 - 04:38:32 UTC
Archived on: Fri May 30 2008 - 02:43:04 UTC

dsdl-comment.2008-05 By Date