[dsdl-comment] Re: Draft for Part 5

Dear Alex,

Here are some comments

== In 5.1.1 XPath expressions ==

— document (W3C XSLT 1.0, section 12.1)
--> Ok for this one

— format-number (W3C XSLT 1.0, section 12.3)
--> Ok for this one

— current (W3C XSLT 1.0, section 12.4)
--> Do we really need it since we can bind "." to a variable ?

— function-available (W3C XSLT 1.0, section 15)
--> I can imagine what the behaviour is but, please detailled it in a note(

— element-available (W3C XSLT 1.0, section 15)
--> I can't clearly see if it applies to DTLL element or
extension-definition-element ?

== And the end of page 10 ==

(?'year'?[0-9]{4})-(?'month'[0-9]{2})-(?'day'[0-9]{2})

What do mean the second "?" just before "[0-9]{4}" ? is it a typo ?

== Matching multiple ==

What does it mean to have "(?'month'[0-9]{2})*" --> does it imply that the
last
value is binded to the variable ? is it an error ?

== In 9.4.2.2 Lists ==

It should be added something about regex clash (i.e. when the separator
regex is in concurrence with the datatype regex) which could be a simple
note or warning

 == Profiles ==
Could we defined two profiles :
a) one with XPath 1.0
b) one with XPath 2.0 and Functions & Operator

Regards,

Mohamed Zergaoui

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Alex Brown <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk>wrote:

> Murata-san,
>
> Please find a new draft for Pt 5 of DSDL attached ...
>
> - Alex.
>
>

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
--
DSDL comments
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)