Probably you just need to take the problem inside/out, don't you ?
Mohamed
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>wrote:
> Inigo Surguy wrote:
>
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> I'm not sure I've completely understood - are you suggesting a need
>> for a URL resolver in XProc that's something like pipe://step/port to
>> pull in the results of an XProc step into, for example, an XSLT
>> document() call?
>>
>>
> Yes.
>
> In XProc at the moment, you can achieve a similar outcome by writing
>> out the output of previous steps to the filesystem, then retrieving
>> the files from within later steps. This is effectively XProc pushing
>> pipeline output in to your later steps, rather than being able to pull
>> data in from the step itself.
>>
>>
> Yes. This is entirely hopeless. Why use XProc at all if you have to use
> explicit files? Answer: none that I can see.
>
> Or are you specifically talking about SAX-style entity resolvers?
>>
>>
> The thing that converts a URL into an XML infoset.
>
> Cheers
> Rick
>
> --
> DSDL comments
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>
-- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 € -- DSDL comments To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-comment-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Thu Feb 26 12:42:14 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 26 2009 - 12:13:02 UTC