[dsdl-discuss] Re: Datatypes

Hi Martin,

Martin Bryan said:
>
> Danger signals! SVG requires not just lists, but pairs, where there
> sometimes needs to be a match between numbers in consecutive pairs.
> Validation of such lists/arrays gets really problematical.

Lists of pairs can already be validated with Relax NG! It's then "only" a
matter of defining the individual types used by these lists of pairs.
> Should we
> really be trying to validate what is clearly a separate notation?

I am still thinking that the framework can help here (by defining
transformations to be performed between the parsed and the lexical spaces)
and would really like to get feedback on my strawman!
In the meantime, I will also update it to show how the different use cases
listed by Rick could be implemented using my proposal.
Thanks

Eric

-- 
See you in San Diego.
                               http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)