[dsdl-discuss] Re: Strawman: bringing the framework inside schemas

Rick Jelliffe said:

> Here is how I would imagine dates should work, under my druthers. Note
> that we can validate exactly your constraints for dates!

<cool-example-removed/>

I'll add this example in the next version of my strawman.

I have a question about embedding Schematron within Relax NG:

Should we assume that a Relax NG validator will pick a Schematron
assertion just recognizing its namespace (like some current
implementations)?
<element name="foo">
 <attribute name="bar"/>
 <assert test="contains(@bar, 'bar')"
    xmlns=""http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron">
  @bar should contain 'bar'
 </assert>
</element>

or should the framework be used to show that a validation needs to be done?

<element name="foo">
 <attribute name="bar"/>
 <if:validate type="http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron">
  <assert test="contains(@bar, 'bar')"
    xmlns=""http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron">
    @bar should contain 'bar'
  </assert>
 </if:validate>
</element>

Eric

-- 
See you in San Diego.
                               http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2002/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)