[dsdl-discuss] Re: Usecase for DSDL

Rick,

A timely reminder, & v. well put.

Ann W.

-----Original Message-----
From: dsdl-discuss-bounce@dsdl.org
[mailto:dsdl-discuss-bounce@dsdl.org]On Behalf Of Rick Jelliffe
Sent: 19 July 2002 03:43
To: dsdl-discuss@dsdl.org
Subject: [dsdl-discuss] Re: Usecase for DSDL

From: "Ann M Wrightson" <ann.wrightson@alphaxml.com>

> 1.3.1 Long life of metadata
> e-GMS metadata can be expected to be long-lived, and contribute to the
> management, discovery and utilization of electronic resources over a long
> life for the resource (eg >100 years for an e-archive of electronic
public
> records). XML is an ISO standard as well as a widely adopted industry
> standard, and a successor to a very similar standard already 25 years
old -
> and so is very likely to be long-lived.

Should be "XML 1.0 is a profile of an ISO standard".

It is important to stress that the W3C has made no committment to
maintaing the SGML compatability for XML, nor the backwards compatability
of future versions. W3C is not in the business of making archiving
standards,
it is a vendor-dominated consortium geared to negotiating solutions to
immediate
problems (where "solution" includes a sales aspect, and where "sales" has a
history of obsoleting old technologies.)

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=subscribe)
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)