[dsdl-discuss] Re: Part numbering

> A) Add 1 to all part numbers, so that the Overview becomes Part 0 and
> Datatype and namespace-aware DTDs becomes Part 10
>
> B) Merge the Overview into Part 1, the Framework, perhaps as an extended
> Introduction to Part 1.
>
> C) Make a reasoned cased to ISO as to why they should break their rules in
> the case of DSDL. (They did offer to consider such a request, though what
> grounds we could reasonably make is not clear.)

I think that B) is the best option. Since Part 2 is already a FDIS,
I am not sure if A) is possible. Is C) possible?

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)