[dsdl-discuss] Re: Interactions between DSDL Part 1 and DSDL Part 4

On 02 Apr 2003 17:07:45 +0200
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> wrote:

>
> Isn't it the same semantic than <isValid> then? The nature of the
> validation is new, but this is a validation by a schema which is opaque
> as far as the framework is concerned.

Yes, the semantic is the same. I think that a specialized
tag name is convenient, but I do not have strong opinion about this.

> The difficulty (and necessity) of <split> came from an attempt to
> separate the definition of the split from the definition of the
> validation to perform on aech island. If we remove this constraint, I
> think we can just drop <split> and allow to include inline schemas
> (whatever their type is) in addition to external schemas.

Agreed.

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)