[dsdl-discuss] Re: Comparison of "prune", "cover", "dummy", and "delve"

From: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Date: Sun Apr 27 2003 - 05:33:21 UTC

On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 00:43:51 +0900
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp> wrote:

>
> <foo:a>
> <bar:b>
> <bar:c/>
> <foo:d/>
> <bar:e>
> <foo:f>
> </foo:f>
> </bar:e>
> </bar:b>
> <bar:f/>
> </foo:a>

I listed four options in my last mail, but another option comes to my
mind. In Option 3, we remove foreign elements (as well as their
attributes and contents). But we can remove the attributes and
contents of foreign elements without removing themselves.

Option 5: Keep foreign elements but prune their attributes
          and contents.

For example, from the above document, Option 3 lead to

<foo:a>
</foo:a>

But Option 5 provides

<foo:a>
  <bar:b></bar:b>
  <bar:f/>
</foo:a>

Cheers,

Makoto

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Sun Apr 27 07:34:01 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:27 UTC