[dsdl-discuss] Re: Syntactical sugar for Namespace Routing Language

From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 15:29:25 UTC

Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> And the current text
> for "attach" is not as luminous as James' usual prose.

Any particular paragraph?

James

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)

Received on Tue Jun 10 17:30:32 2003

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: James Clark: "[dsdl-discuss] Re: Syntactical sugar for Namespace Routing Language"
Previous message: James Clark: "[dsdl-discuss] Re: Namespace Routing Language"
In reply to: Rick Jelliffe: "[dsdl-discuss] Syntactical sugar for Namespace Routing Language"
Next in thread: James Clark: "[dsdl-discuss] Re: Syntactical sugar for Namespace Routing Language"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:27 UTC