On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 19:16, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> From: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>
>
> > ... what about using an EBNF expressed
> > with Relax NG to define the lexical space of our datatypes?
>
> Do you mean as a formalism or for real lexical validation of datatypes?
Both. I we have the formalism, it shouldn't be a big deal to get the
code, especially if the formalism is similar to Relax NG and can produce
an EBNF: there should be quite a lot of tools to build on from both
sides!
Eric
--
Tired to type XML tags?
http://wikiml.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upcoming Schema languages tutorial (registration open):
- July 7th (Portland, OR) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K27A527A4
- August 4th (Montreal, Canada) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U28A217A4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Wed Jun 11 19:12:52 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:27 UTC