[dsdl-discuss] Re: Namespace Routing Language

Jirka Kosek wrote:
> James Clark wrote:
>
>>> The second para of Section 12 should use some special font for the
>>> tokens "attribute" and "elements".
>>
>>
>> It's actually marked up as <code>, but, at least on my machine, the
>> mixture of sans-serif and monospace looks really ugly, so the
>> stylesheet turns off the font switch. I need to find some non-ugly way
>> to distinguish <code>. Any suggestions?
>
>
> What about boldface? It is not used for anything else in your document.

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried bold. It's definitely an improvement
on monospace, but it makes the document look like a checkerboard. I
ended up using single quotes around <code>.

James

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)