On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 10:45, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> > * I am not sure whether it is enough to keep the same namespace
> > since you have introduced new features which will not be
> > supported by existing implementations of Schematron: "new"
> > implementations will have no problem with existing schemas, but
> > the opposite will be more problematic.
>
> There has been a version number in effect for Schematron since version 1.5.
> Schematron implementations that don't implement version checking (and I
> think none do, but it is trivial to add) are not implementing the spec, to
> some extent. Blame the victim!
Fair enough!
It would probably make sense to make it Schematron version 2.0 but I
think you should mention it (in bold red letters) in the spec, then...
Eric
--
Read me on XML.com.
http://www.xml.com/pub/au/74
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upcoming Schema languages tutorial (registration open):
- August 4th (Montreal, Canada) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U28A217A4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Tue Jul 15 10:57:51 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:27 UTC