[dsdl-discuss] Re: Papers for Philadelphia meeting

> Murata: Do we need to discuss Jame's proposal for the Namespace Routing
> Language? If so, which Part of DSDL does it form a component of?

First, I am afraid that I have not created the FCD for Part 4. I think
that we should seriously consider NRL, which is intended to be an input
to the Part 4 FCD.

In particular, James wrote:

        The functionality corresponding to 14 Transparent namespaces, was
        rejected on the last occasion it was discussed; one reason was the
        lack of implementation experience. It is hoped that this can be reconsidered
        in the light of NRL.

        The functionality provided by the 'option' element in 3 Specifying
        the schema has not yet been considered for the FCD.

I am wondering if it is possible to revise the comment disposition we
agreed last time and incorporate "transparent namespaces" at the very least.

Is this doable?

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)