[dsdl-discuss] Re: WG1 in Amsterdam

Note also for WG1 that the ISO procedures have engaged the "2 year inactive
rule" and automatically cancelled some of the DSDL parts. I gather my
procedure is to demonstrate progress on a part through resolutions of the
SC from recommendations of the WG that will revive the parts to an active
status.

Please address these in your WG1 recommendations.

Thanks!

................... Ken

At 2004-03-04 11:59 +0000, Martin Bryan wrote:
>As far as I am concerned there are only two items for discussion at the
>meeting, both dependent on documents that have been promised but have yet to
>materialize:
>
>1) David Carlisle has promised an updated version of the revision to 9573-11
>by the end of March. Depending on the state of this document we will need to
>put it out for CD or FCD balloting. This can be handled at the Tuesday
>plenary as I do not expect anyone attending the WG1 meeting (other than
>myself) to want to comment on this.
>
>2) Murata-san has promised a draft for Part 4, but without him being present
>I don't think we can have a meaningful discussion on it. Therefore I propose
>that we handle questions or comments on this first draft by e-mail, and I
>simply put forward a resolution to the effect that we handle this at the
>final plenary.

--
G. Ken Holman                    Crane Softwrights Ltd.
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretariat  Standards Council of Canada
Committee correspondence:        mailto:jtc1sc34@scc.ca
Committee website:               http://www.y12.doe.gov/sgml/sc34/
Corporate correspondence:        mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Corporate website:               http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/a/
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)