[dsdl-discuss] Re: WG1 in Amsterdam

Ken

> Note also for WG1 that the ISO procedures have engaged the "2 year
inactive
> rule" and automatically cancelled some of the DSDL parts. I gather my
> procedure is to demonstrate progress on a part through resolutions of the
> SC from recommendations of the WG that will revive the parts to an active
> status.
>
> Please address these in your WG1 recommendations.

One thing we need to be clear on is whether it is essential that all parts
of a multipart standard are "showing progress". Surely it is enough to prove
that parts that are on the critical path are under production, and to state
that Part Y is dependent of the completion of Part Y.

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)