[dsdl-discuss] Re: SC34 WG1 Amsterdam - Lack of Agenda

> I have a feeling that we should stick to XML 1.0. However, I would
appreciate
> some discussion about this in the plenary, so that every WG does the same
thing.

The problem with this approach is that it will require us to do a DSDL 2.0
to cope with the next revision to XML/XSLT/.... We should not define any
techniques that are specific to a level of XML but allow the level of XML
that is being applied to be declared, perhaps along the lines of:

 <usesVersions>
    <spec name="XML" version="1.1">http://.....</spec>
    <spec name="namespaces" version="1.1">http://.......</spec>
    <spec="XSLT" version="2.0">http://...</spec>
 ...
</usesVersions>

with some sort of rule saying that mismatched versions are outside the scope
of the spec to detect.

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)