[dsdl-discuss] Re: SC34 WG1 Amsterdam - Lack of Agenda

Hi Martin,

On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 16:29, Martin Bryan wrote:
> > I have a feeling that we should stick to XML 1.0. However, I would
> appreciate
> > some discussion about this in the plenary, so that every WG does the same
> thing.
>
> The problem with this approach is that it will require us to do a DSDL 2.0
> to cope with the next revision to XML/XSLT/....

I think we should make a distinction between the specs which are the
foundation on which all the DSDL parts are built (i.e. XML and
namespaces in XML) and other specs to which some of the DSDL parts may
make a reference (such as XSLT).

The situation is especially tricky with XSLT and XPath since XPath and
XSLT 1.0 on one hand and XPath and XSLT 2.0 on the other hand are to
sets of very different languages and that XPath and XSLT 2.0 are built
on W3C XML Schema and concepts such as the PSVI that we've refused to
support in DSDL and that we would indirectly "import" by relying on
them.

My 0.02 Euros.

Eric

-- 
Read me on XML.com.
                                            http://www.xml.com/pub/au/74
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
 - Amsterdam   -half day- (18/04/2004)        http://masl.to/?P220516D7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)