Hi Alex,
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 10:11, Alex Brown wrote:
> Would a way through be to specify XPath 1.0 with an expanded set of
> functions (which match those we identify as useful in XPath 2.0)?
Yes, that'd be a way (there is already a -low momentum- project named
"XPath NG" which would like to do so) but I think that even full XPath
1.0 (which isn't streamable) is too much and meaningless for some of the
parts.
Eric
> - Alex.
--
Curious about Relax NG? Read my book online.
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
- Amsterdam -half day- (18/04/2004) http://masl.to/?P220516D7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Tue Apr 6 10:22:58 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:28 UTC