[dsdl-discuss] Re: Response to rest of Martin's comments

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:14:48 +1000
Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au> wrote:

>
> until the WG decides whether it wants to adopt Part 7 using the Part 3
> framework.

I oppose to standardize Schematron-based binding as part of Part 7. Such
a binding should be moved to Part 3.

I am particularly unhappy with the conformance section. It certainly
mandates the support of Schematron.

Here is my counter proposal for the scope of Part 7.

<scope>
<p><This>This committee-draft standard</This> specifies a mechanism
for declaring and validating the allowed character repertoire. This
language may be used from the other parts (including Part 3) of this
standard for constraining data content, attribute values, identifiers
and other markup in XML documents.</p>

<p><This>This committee-draft standard</This> establishes requirements
for declaring the allowed character repertoire and also specifies when a
string is valid against such declarations.</p>
</scope>

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)