[dsdl-discuss] Re: Part 8

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:42:45 +0100
"Francis Cave" <francis@franciscave.com> wrote:

> In my opinion, while it would be possible in principle for an SC to submit
> an unstable text for FCD ballot, it would not be sensible to do so. If a
> second FCD ballot becomes necessary, the whole process will have been
> substantially delayed, since the comments of ISO and IEC members must again
> be sought. An FCD ballot takes a minimum of four months, while a regular CD
> ballot takes a minimum of three months (see. 9.4.1).

Thank you for thorugh clarification. Now that there is a WG1 meeting in September,
it does not make any sense to have a four month ballot. I agree to make the second
CD.

I have made some more progress. The notation section is still missing, but
I will finish it tommorrow.

http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~eb2m-mrt/dsdl/nvdl.pdf

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)