[dsdl-discuss] Re: Part 4

> MURATA Makoto wrote:
>
> >I agree that the RNG schemas are a bit painful to read. But I still have
not moved
> >them to normative annexes yet. If we do so, we will have two sections
> >having only one paragraph. Will that be acceptable and readable than the
current
> >version?
> >
> >
Rick responded

> Yes and yes. It is better to keep prose close.

There is also a strong case to be made for diagrams. We could do one of two
things:

a) replace the existing schemas with pictures of the model structure (UML or
Schema Visualiser output)

b) Merge the single sentences left in Clauses 6 and 8 with clause 7,
renaming it to cover both syntaxes, e.g. Full and Simplified NVDL syntaxes

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)