[dsdl-discuss] Re: Part 3, correctly formatted

From: Martin Bryan <martin@is-thought.co.uk>
Date: Sun May 02 2004 - 08:44:54 UTC

Rick

Bad news is that I've been wasting the holiday weekend reading JTC1
directives (my excuse is that its raining!)

I note that in Part 3 there is no statement relating to patents. ISO policy
requires us to have a clear statement on this issue.

An editor is supposed to determine for material taken from external sources:
a) How willing are the organisation and its members to meet the ISO/IEC
policy on these matters?

b) What patent rights, covering any item of the proposal, is a PAS owner
aware of?

For referenced standards we are supposed to check:

What is the status of meeting the ISO/IEC policy on patent matters?

Could I ask you to make some clear statement re Schematron in this issue.

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Sun May 2 10:45:00 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:28 UTC