[dsdl-discuss] Re: A tentative draft for Part 4

Murata-san

> I have addressed some of the comments from Martin and Rick.

Looks more than tentative - looks like good enough to ballot.

> In particular, I created annexes for RNG schemas and merged
> the three sections for the full syntax, simple syntax, and
> simplification. I also created a new section entitled "primitive
> operations", and moved the second half of the data model section
> to this new section.

Much better, though I would still like to see either a diagram or a listing
of the elements used for the full and simple syntax in Clauses 6.2 and 6.3.
I'd also lile to see a statement justifying the reason for using both the
full and simplified syntaxes, rather than just that they exist.

I still find the example in 7.3 confusing. At the very least you need a
message stating that this version will generate an error message because the
"attribute slot node does not belong to the E" and give an example that
would not generate an error.

I cannot understand why 7.3 requires a warning message to be issued if the
attribute node does not belong to E but 7.4 does not require a warning if
element slot nodes are mismatched.

Unresolved editorial issues should be listed in an annex at the back of the
document and cross-referred to the relevant clause.

I still have a number of typos and textual clarifications to make, but I'll
save those for the UK ballot on the text.

Good luck on completing the draft for distribution next week

Martin

>
> http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~eb2m-mrt/dsdl/nvdl.pdf
> --
> MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)