[dsdl-discuss] Re: FW: DSDL: Physical validation

From: Gerth van Wijk, Diederik <DGerth@Kluwer.nl>
Date: Tue Sep 28 2004 - 15:26:15 UTC

In the proposal I made last year for Part 7, the constraints
> * Specific characters must be represented using particular entities
> (e.g. non-breaking spaces as &nbsp;)
> * Specific characters must be included as native characters
> rather than
> as entities or character references
> * Character references must use the hexadecimal version
> rather than the
> decimal version of the character's codepoint

could and should not be checked. I think these constraints would need an exra kind of specification and validation, part 7 is just about the repertoire and not about the encoding.

I think these are nice requirements, we have similar constraints (like "use just 7 bit US-ASCII and decimal character references"). Whether or not it should be part of a Document Schema Definition I don't know. My feeling is YES, processing IS part of a definition i.m.h.o.

Diederik

--
D.A. Gerth van Wijk, Contentarchitect
Content Office, Kluwer BV
Staverenstraat 32015, 7418 CJ Deventer
Postbus 23, 7400 GA  Deventer
T +31-570-64 73 86
F +31-570-62 71 14
E dgerth@kluwer.nl
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Tue Sep 28 17:26:22 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:00:28 UTC