[dsdl-discuss] Re: FW: DSDL: Physical validation

Rick

A question re the relationship between two of the statements made in your
latest missive, for which many thanks:

>I strongly recommend, if people are interested in persuing this,
that only the information provided by SAX 2 with its extensions
can be considered. Anything else requires a custom parser, which
would be crazy.

and

>XSLT 2 has new features for ensuring that certain characters
are marked up using references: there will be less need for
validation.

Does SAX2 pick up all the information needed for XSLT2 processing? My
concern is that if we restricted ourselves to the set of additional
information provided by SAX2 there would be certain XSLT2 operations we
would have to forbid. Any thoughts as to what these would be?

Martn

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)