[dsdl-discuss] Re: DSDL Part 1

Martin

> > What has to be reviewed? I do not think that the FCDs for
> other parts of
> > DSDL have to be reviewed in Washington.
>
> True. It's just any new papers that are to be put forward (I was
> hoping for
> a draft of Part 9, etc)

I have been working on a very rough draft of Part 9, but have got
unavoidably diverted onto other more immediately pressing work and I must
therefore apologise for having missed the four-week deadline. I shall, I
hope, get something drafted in the next week or so and submit it anyway,
with the hope that those folks who are interested will have a chance to look
at it before we meet.

Francis

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)