[dsdl-discuss] Re: DIS XML for Part 3 with disposition of

>And if there is a requirement from the Japanese that every new XML
language is in an XML Namespace, for management or SOAP enveloping
reasons, then perhaps they might like to raise it at SC34 as a general
policy. (For publishing, I have never seen namespaces used, for the usual
reasons that i) publishers need entity references and hence DTDs, and ii)
that publishing DTDs tend to be old and evolving rather than new
vocabularies. So I am loath to use them except where modularity is
needed.)

I will raise this at the WG1 meeting, and seriously oppose it for reasons
along the lines you indicated. I will also oppose its adoption in Part 3 for
the reasons given in my message to Murata.

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)