[dsdl-discuss] Re: Part 10 Scenario

Hi Martin,

Le mardi 04 janvier 2005 à 18:59 +0000, Martin Bryan a écrit :
> I've now managed to put together a "scenario" that I think will test any
> pipelining language that we want to "adopt" for Part 10. I've asked a few
> people to suggest how things like Cocoon, DPML and JAXP would handle this
> scenario. Can you provide examples of other pipelining (or even Make type
> programs such as Ant) that could be used to manage data using this scenario.
> Better still, can you think of a more demanding test for any candidate
> pipelining language that we could put into Part 10?

I am very confused by this scenario that goes against most of what I had
understood from previous meetings and decisions (and against the
arguments that had ruled out the previous proposal that I had called
"outie").

In particular, I thought we had decided that part 10 should not be a
pipeline language because pipeline languages were too procedural and
that part 10 shouldn't support splitting documents into parallel
validation since that was done the goal of NVDL.

Have you taken other orientations during the last meetings (that I am
shameful to have missed)?

If that's the case, rather than Cocoon or Ant, I'd suggest that we have
a look at Orbeon's XPL
(http://www.orbeon.com/ois/doc/reference-xpl-pipelines) that seems
perfectly able to do all what you're asking for.

Eric

>
> Martin

-- 
Have you ever thought about unit testing XSLT templates?
                                                     http://xsltunit.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)