Rick
Starting to catch up on a few of the things I was unable to follow up last
month. Re:
> Schematron's <phase> mechanism already allows some kind of versioning.
Not sure how versioning could be implemented efficiently using <phase>.
Could you elaborate?
> And hopefully the things that can invoke Schematron (part 4 etc) will have
> mechanism for supplying parameters.
Are you thinking of the parameters becoming phase identifiers?
> But I think versioning is better handled by some DSDL-wide mechanism,
> if at all.
I was presuming so, but unless we have our own language for Part 10, I'm not
sure how we can do this using existing pipelining protocol (unless we
introduce something like a dsdl:version attribute)
First though, we've got to get Schematron on the standards wagon!
-- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Sun Feb 6 20:50:15 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 06 2005 - 19:53:01 UTC