Martin Bryan wrote:
> Many thanks for the heads up. I wasn't very enamoured with the idea
> myself, but I did like the underlying generate -> transform ->
> serialize model. Whether this will be extensible into a split ->
> validate -> transform -> join model that can handle the suggested
> scenario remains to be discovered
Of course, my opinion is that a more flexible language (XPL), or a
subset thereof, should be considered, but I am biased ;-)
>> http://www.orbeon.com/ops/2005/SUBM-xpl-20050222/
>
> Ah, some decent Easter reading for us all. Should go well with the
> Easter eggs!
Although this is probably not an easy read (but don't we all love
reading specs?). Feedback is very welcome, related or not with the
DSDL use case.
-Erik
-- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Tue Mar 22 21:45:09 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 22 2005 - 20:48:02 UTC