Peter
Rereading your excellent draft on the use of DPML for document validation
while on holiday last week I ran into problems with one statement, which was
> <comment>
> **************
> After completion of step 10 the HTML (both streams), and
> SVG (both streams) should be recombined to produce a
> single stream that can fed to a web browser.
> **************
> </comment>
> <instr>
> <type>transform-XSLT</type>
> <source>var:docbook</source>
> <transform>
> stylesheet-to-aggregate-everything.xslt
> </transform>
> <html-param>var:html</html-param>
> <svg-param>var:svg</svg-param>
> <mathml-param>var:mathml</mathml-param>
> <target>this:response</target>
> </instr>
> <exception>
In the syncrhonous version the source for the equivalent statement was
var:docbook-as-html and the params were the schematronized and svg versions,
e.g.
<comment>
**************
After completion of step 10 the HTML (both streams), and
SVG (both streams) should be recombined to produce a
single stream that can fed to a web browser.
**************
</comment>
<instr>
<type>transform-XSLT</type>
<source>var:docbook-as-html</source>
<transform>
stylesheet-to-aggregate-everything.xslt
</transform>
<html-param>var:html-schematronized</html-param>
<svg-param>var:svg-schematronized</svg-param>
<mathml-param>var:mathml-as-svg</mathml-param>
<target>this:response</target>
</instr>
<exception>
For the asynchronous versions you go back to the original documents -
seeming thereby to loose the conversions to html and svg. Can you please
explain how the conversions get integrated using this approach. Thanks
Martin Bryan
-- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)Received on Wed Apr 13 08:40:40 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 13 2005 - 16:33:01 UTC