Dear WG1ers
The attached update for Part 10 contains a whole raft of questions I
want to discuss about the proposed extensions to the demonstration of
pipelining techniques that were requested in Amsterdam. A summary of the
main questions can be found on the last page.
There is an underlying question behind all this:
"Should validation management be based on the application of existing
pipelining languages (presumably by finding a common subset between
them) or does it require that we define functions over and above those
defined in existing languages?"
In another phaseology, "Do we make do with what's already there or do we
need to get what's there improved, and if the latter do we have a
mandate to do that?"
Thoughts?
Martin
-- DSDL members discussion list To unsubscribe, please send a message with the command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 23:23:02 UTC