[dsdl-discuss] PROJECTS 'AT RISK'

From: Martin Bryan <martin@is-thought.co.uk>
Date: Sat Jan 07 2006 - 17:05:22 UTC

Heads up editors

As I warned in Atlanta, ISO is starting to tighten up the rules on delivery
of standards, and our standards are being flagged as "in danger" in the
email below.

We can ignore the status of Part 4, as that has recently gone to ISO. Part 5
looks like a problem with the ISO matrix, as a DIS date cannot be met when
we are still at WD stage, and we have a CD in the pipeline (Alex, we need to
ensure Jeni is aware that delivery of the next stage has reached critical
point.)

I've got Parts 8 and 10 under control (I hope) but Parts 7 and 9 need some
action soon. Re Part 6 we need to explain why we have no editor for this
part. Now that XSLT 2.0 is at Candidate Recommendation stage we need to
review the requirements for this part. I suggest we try to do this
electronically between now and our next meeting in Soeul at the end of May
so we at least have a requirements statement to reference.

Jim: We need to ensure that ISO is correctly mapping changes to the SC34
status matrix. The matrix at
http://www.jtc1sc34.org/document/secretariat_temp.html shows 2007-12 as the
target FDIS date for Part 5, and that Part 4 is already at FDIS, not FCD.
Suggest we simply ask them to check their database against our published
matrix.

Martin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mason, James David (MXM)" <masonjd@y12.doe.gov>
To: "UK/ISUG: Martin T. Bryan" <martin@is-thought.co.uk>; "Norway HoD: Steve
Pepper" <pepper@ontopia.net>
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: FYI: ISO/IEC/JTC 1/SC 34 - MONTHLY NOTIFICATION OF PROJECTS 'AT
RISK'

-----Original Message-----
From: projects@iso.org [mailto:projects@iso.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:04 PM
To: Mason, James David (MXM); jtc1sc34@scc.ca
Cc: brannon@iso.org
Subject: ISO/IEC/JTC 1/SC 34 - MONTHLY NOTIFICATION OF PROJECTS 'AT RISK'

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please find below this month's list of projects having a "Warning" or
"Critical" status or as well as projects having been deleted within the last
month based on the TMB resolutions related to the 2-year and 5-year rules
(as
also listed on your committee's work programme) (read more on what this
status means by clicking on the link below).

http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/3347696/3352413/Explana
tions_and_rules.html?nodeid=3358562&vernum=0

Should you have any questions, please contact your Technical Programme
Manager (mailto:brannon@iso.org).

Note: The accuracy of both these services depends on the information
available to us about the current status of a project as stored in the
ISO/CS
database. In order that the database is as up-to-date as possible, and
therefore provides you with reliable data, please be sure to advise ISO/CS
regularly of changes.

With kind regards,

Standards Development and Production
ISO Central Secretariat

Projects having a "critical" status
-----------------------------------

     DIS target date exceeded (development track rules)

          ISO/IEC WD 13250-1
          ISO/IEC CD 13250-5
          ISO/IEC CD 18048
          ISO/IEC CD 19756
          ISO/IEC WD 19757-5

     FDIS target date exceeded (development track rules)

          ISO/IEC FCD 13250-4

Projects having a "warning" status
-----------------------------------

     DIS target date due in 6 months (development track rules)

          ISO/IEC WD 19757-6
          ISO/IEC CD 19757-7
          ISO/IEC WD 19757-8
          ISO/IEC WD 19757-9
          ISO/IEC WD 19757-10

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
Received on Sat Jan 7 18:05:29 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 12 2006 - 14:48:01 UTC