[dsdl-discuss] Re: PROJECTS 'AT RISK'

I am preparing an ISO-ized version of the most recent version of DTLL,
as discussed in Atlanta. This will be ready in a few days. Jeni has some
further improvements she wants to make, but if we get the current
version to DIS, then this will satisfy ISO and give us all something to
chew on.

- Alex.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdl-discuss-bounce@dsdl.org
> [mailto:dsdl-discuss-bounce@dsdl.org] On Behalf Of Martin Bryan
> Sent: 07 January 2006 17:05
> To: dsdl-discuss@dsdl.org
> Cc: jtc1sc34@scc.ca; masonjd@y12.doe.gov
> Subject: [dsdl-discuss] PROJECTS 'AT RISK'
>
> Heads up editors
>
> As I warned in Atlanta, ISO is starting to tighten up the
> rules on delivery of standards, and our standards are being
> flagged as "in danger" in the email below.
>
> We can ignore the status of Part 4, as that has recently gone
> to ISO. Part 5 looks like a problem with the ISO matrix, as a
> DIS date cannot be met when we are still at WD stage, and we
> have a CD in the pipeline (Alex, we need to ensure Jeni is
> aware that delivery of the next stage has reached critical
> point.)
>
> I've got Parts 8 and 10 under control (I hope) but Parts 7
> and 9 need some action soon. Re Part 6 we need to explain why
> we have no editor for this part. Now that XSLT 2.0 is at
> Candidate Recommendation stage we need to review the
> requirements for this part. I suggest we try to do this
> electronically between now and our next meeting in Soeul at
> the end of May so we at least have a requirements statement
> to reference.
>
> Jim: We need to ensure that ISO is correctly mapping changes
> to the SC34 status matrix. The matrix at
> http://www.jtc1sc34.org/document/secretariat_temp.html shows
> 2007-12 as the target FDIS date for Part 5, and that Part 4
> is already at FDIS, not FCD.
> Suggest we simply ask them to check their database against
> our published matrix.
>
> Martin
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mason, James David (MXM)" <masonjd@y12.doe.gov>
> To: "UK/ISUG: Martin T. Bryan" <martin@is-thought.co.uk>;
> "Norway HoD: Steve Pepper" <pepper@ontopia.net>
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:56 PM
> Subject: FYI: ISO/IEC/JTC 1/SC 34 - MONTHLY NOTIFICATION OF
> PROJECTS 'AT RISK'
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: projects@iso.org [mailto:projects@iso.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:04 PM
> To: Mason, James David (MXM); jtc1sc34@scc.ca
> Cc: brannon@iso.org
> Subject: ISO/IEC/JTC 1/SC 34 - MONTHLY NOTIFICATION OF
> PROJECTS 'AT RISK'
>
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> Please find below this month's list of projects having a "Warning" or
> "Critical" status or as well as projects having been deleted
> within the last
> month based on the TMB resolutions related to the 2-year and
> 5-year rules
> (as
> also listed on your committee's work programme) (read more on
> what this
> status means by clicking on the link below).
>
> http://isotc.iso.ch/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/3347696/
> 3352413/Explana
> tions_and_rules.html?nodeid=3358562&vernum=0
>
> Should you have any questions, please contact your Technical Programme
> Manager (mailto:brannon@iso.org).
>
> Note: The accuracy of both these services depends on the information
> available to us about the current status of a project as stored in the
> ISO/CS
> database. In order that the database is as up-to-date as possible, and
> therefore provides you with reliable data, please be sure to
> advise ISO/CS
> regularly of changes.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Standards Development and Production
> ISO Central Secretariat
>
>
> Projects having a "critical" status
> -----------------------------------
>
> DIS target date exceeded (development track rules)
>
> ISO/IEC WD 13250-1
> ISO/IEC CD 13250-5
> ISO/IEC CD 18048
> ISO/IEC CD 19756
> ISO/IEC WD 19757-5
>
> FDIS target date exceeded (development track rules)
>
> ISO/IEC FCD 13250-4
>
>
> Projects having a "warning" status
> -----------------------------------
>
> DIS target date due in 6 months (development track rules)
>
> ISO/IEC WD 19757-6
> ISO/IEC CD 19757-7
> ISO/IEC WD 19757-8
> ISO/IEC WD 19757-9
> ISO/IEC WD 19757-10
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> DSDL members discussion list
>
> To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
> command "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
> (mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)
>
>

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)