[dsdl-discuss] Re: DTLL / RELAX NG "libraries"

Alex

>If XInclude is assumed to be available that removes the need for DTLL's
own <include> element, which I propose removing.

Not sure about this. Can we presume that all DSDL tools will be XInclude
aware? I think not. Do we want to require all DTLL-aware tools to also be
XInclude-aware? Is it invalid to have both a DTLL specific inclusion
mechanism and a separate XInclude one? (For example, does the <include>
element in RELAX NG actually preclude the use of an XInclusion declaration
being used to include additional information within the schema?)

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)