[dsdl-discuss] Re: DTLL / RELAX NG "libraries"

Alex

>Could we say that Part 5 has its own include element, but that it must
be interpretted identically to (say) Xinclude's include element, or
RELAX NG's ?

To me this is the ideal solution. Specifically it should be identical to
RELAX NGs.

>I don't think it would be right to have yet another kind of include
(with a different spec.) in DSDL.

Agreed. We probably need to think of changing the Schematron one at a later
day to use the same attributes as RELAX NG rather (or as well as) those that
are used for historical reasons.

Martin

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)