[dsdl-discuss] Re: DTLL / RELAX NG "libraries"

Martin Bryan wrote:

>Agreed. We probably need to think of changing the Schematron one at a later
>day to use the same attributes as RELAX NG rather (or as well as) those that
>are used for historical reasons.
>
>
We discussed having a common include element (as part of the framework)
a couple of
years ago, when discussing the Schematron include, didn't we? My memory
is often different
from other peoples' :-( We decided against it: xinclude is different from
xsd:include/import/redefine is different from relax:include is different
from
schematron:include because the things being included (and the scope and
visibility of
included things) are different and schema-language specific.

So I tend to think that each language having a different include with
specific semantics is
a good and necessary thing.

Cheers
Rick

--
DSDL members discussion list
To unsubscribe, please send a message with the
command  "unsubscribe" to dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org
(mailto:dsdl-discuss-request@dsdl.org?Subject=unsubscribe)